The main points I found most useful were (italics are my emphasis, bold is the author's):
"its use should be limited to foods or beverages that will inherently add something positive to the diet. In other words, if you aren’t getting anything positive from the meal or drink, you shouldn’t be taking the risk of the artificial sweetener. A better angle? Expand your cooking repertoire. Train your taste buds in the right direction, and don’t let the artificial stuff get in the way of that progress."
And:
"Thank goodness there is no paleo high priest to decree one way or another and excommunicate us for our sins. As Richard Nikoley has eloquently pointed out more than once "paleo is not a [insert expletive here] religion." It is a guiding principle."
And:
"The top of PaleoHacks is currently sporting a quote from Dr. Kurt Harris: "Metabolism first, history second." ... I anticipate that his answer to this question would be similar to the one he gave about pork rinds: "Are you planning on making it a staple?""
And finally:
"...if making your stevia sweetened soda helps you along in your transition from Neolithic SAD-eating human cattle to Paleo Man-god then I say on the whole it is positive. Even if you never make it to [eliminating sweetener], nutritionally and health-wise you will still be light years ahead of your former self."
The answer/comment was given by user KetoWarrior. I hope he doesn't mind my quoting but paraphrasing would have been more plagiaristic in my opinion. Plus since it's a comment from a forum it's possible the link may stop working eventually.
No comments:
Post a Comment